Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of udg/ecoms/EndUserNeeds/CII


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 19, 2013 2:27:36 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
rodri
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • udg/ecoms/EndUserNeeds/CII

    v5 v6  
    3838     || Cloudiness (in octas)       || Instantaneous at 7am, 2pm and 9pm (local time) ||  PET  ||
    3939
    40 Note that the calculation of these CIIs involve particular variables at specific local times in some cases. However, the SPECS-EUPORIAS data portal does only intend to make available a reduced number of variables (tipically surface variables such as precipitation and temperatures) at certain UTC times. Therefore, feedback from end-users is needed in order to define the common set of variables/UTC times which will be stored, taking into account the requirements for (among others) the calculation of the above CIIs. See [https://meteo.unican.es/trac/wiki/SpecsEuporias/EndUserNeeds/NoteTimeAggregation this] for further details.
     40Note that, in some cases, the calculation of these CIIs involve the used of data at specific local times. However, the SPECS-EUPORIAS data portal does only intend to make available a reduced number of variables (tipically surface variables such as precipitation and temperatures) at certain UTC times. Therefore, end-users' feedback is needed in order to define the common set of variables/UTC times which will be stored, taking into account the requirements needed for (among others) the calculation of the above CIIs (further details on this can be found [https://meteo.unican.es/trac/wiki/SpecsEuporias/EndUserNeeds/NoteTimeAggregation here]).
     41In this context, in the '''EUPORIAS WP23''' (''Impact models for impact predictions''), [http://www.predictia.es/ Predictia] has circulated a [http://demo.predictia.es/inventory/ questionnaire] with the aim of gathering information about the variables (as well as their temporal and spatial reoslution) needed by the different partners involved in the WP in order to run their impact models. So far, only [http://www.cetaqua.com/en CETaqua] has replied to the questionnaire.