Version 1 (modified by juaco, 7 years ago) (diff)

--

# Example 3. Calculating the bias of an ensemble forecast

In this example we will calculate the bias of the multimember forecast loaded in the previous example.

We first load the reference observations for the spatio-temporal domain previously chosen:

> ex2.obs <- loadECOMS(dataset = "WFDEI", var = "tasmin", lonLim = c(-15,35), latLim = c(32, 75), season = c(12,1,2), years = 2001:2010)
[2014-09-02 17:07:43] Defining homogeneization parameters for variable "tasmin"
[2014-09-02 17:07:44] Defining geo-location parameters
[2014-09-02 17:07:44] Defining time selection parameters
[2014-09-02 17:07:44] Retrieving data subset ...
[2014-09-02 17:07:58] Done
> print(object.size(ex2.obs), units = "Mb")
60.6 Mb


This is the map of the observed mean minimum surface temperature observed for DJF 2001-2010:

> plotMeanField(ex2.obs)


Note that WFDEI provides data for land areas only, and its spatial resolution is finer than CFS (1º vs 0.5º). In order to compare both datasets, it is first necessary to put them in the same grid (i.e., to interpolate). We use bilinear interpolation to this aim, using the downscaleR function interpGridData in combination with the getGrid method, useful to recover the parameters defining the grid of a dataset to pass them to the interpolator:

> obs.regridded <- interpGridData(gridData = ex2.obs, new.grid = getGrid(ex2), method = "bilinear")
[2014-09-02 17:22:11] Performing bilinear interpolation... may take a while
[2014-09-02 17:22:30] Done
Warning messages:
1: In interpGridData(gridData = ex2.obs, new.grid = getGrid(ex2), method = "bilinear") :
The new longitudes are outside the data extent
2: In interpGridData(gridData = ex2.obs, new.grid = getGrid(ex2), method = "bilinear") :
The new latitudes are outside the data extent


Note the warnings reminding us that the extent of the input grid is wider that that of CFS. However, in this case we can safely ignore this warnings, since all the land areas we are interest in are within the CFS domain.

> plotMeanField(obs.regridded)


Now that both model data and observations are in the same grid, we can compute the bias. First, we calculate the spatial mean of WFDEI, which is the reference against which to compute the biases:

> ref <- apply(obs.regridded$Data, MARGIN = c(3,2), mean, na.rm = TRUE)  The following lines of code compute the bias of each member w.r.t. the reference and plot them: # Now we compute the difference agains each of the multimember spatial means: > require(fields) > n.members <- dim(ex2$Data)[1]
> par(mfrow = c(1,2))
> for (i in 1:n.members) {
+       member <- apply(ex2$Data[i, , , ], MARGIN = c(3,2), mean, na.rm = TRUE) + bias <- member - ref + image.plot(ex2$xyCoords$x, ex2$xyCoords\$y, bias, xlab = "lon", ylab = "lat", asp = 1)
+       title(paste("Bias member", i))